Cenas de produção e avaliação de textos na alfabetização: um olhar sobre a prática pedagógica
Carregando...
Data
2018-03-01
Autores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Federal de Goiás
Resumo
This study is aimed to investigate the pedagogical practices of literacy teachers of the last year of
cycle I, third year of elementary school education in Goiânia’s Municipal Education Network,
which regards to the teaching and evaluation of writing. This research is qualitative and has as
instruments of data collection, an interview, an observation and a documentary analysis. The study
had as subjects, there teachers who teach Portuguese classes. In the analysis, we focused on seven
textual production proposals, and one hundred and sixty corrected texts. In this research we
adopted the presuppositions of interactionism, which conceives language as a means of social
interaction. The main authors studied and who defend these postulates were Bakhtin, and one of its
main interlocutors in Brazil, Geraldi and others. The analysis of the results showed that although
teachers consider the work with textual production important, the space and the necessary
conditions for its realisation are still not given by most of them. We observed that there still is the
conception that the teaching of textual production should only happen once the Alphabetic Writing
System (SEA), that is, the writing technique, has already been mastered. The results showed that
the textual production proposals presented to the students were without prior activities, artificial,
mechanical and repetitive with eminently ready themes of the literary narration genre and these
were often supported by images, having as interlocutor the school and the teacher. As for the
written production evaluation, noticed by the marks of correction left by the teachers in the
students’ texts, we perceived that the teachers assume the correction of the indicative type,
resolutive and textual suggestive, to the detriment of the textual interactive. And, when they
perform the suggestive textual, they demonstrate the conception of evaluation of a monological
character, that is, it doesn’t provide dialogue and interaction, therefore, it doesn’t help the student
the student perceive and improve his text. Another aspect that was perceived is that the marks of
correction left by the teachers in the students’ texts do not collaborate so that they can reflect on
their textual problems and solve them. Moreover, these highlights prioritise metalinguistic analysis
in detriment of epilingualism, focusing more on the problems on the text surface than on those
responsible for textuality and discursiveness. Regarding the practice of individual rewriting, we
noticed that, although requested by the teachers, there was no follow-up during during the
observations in the pieces of the texts, except in the practice of the teacher Magda, who performs,
in her own classroom, with the student, the epilingualistic reflection. The collective rewriting was
observed in the practice of all teachers, it happened in an interactive way, with the teacher and the
student problematising and reflecting on the text, in a collaborative attitude aimed at improving the
text and for the formation of writers of more efficient texts. From the analysis carried out, we
understand that language teaching, although it has already advanced a great deal, it still presents
challenging nuances, revealing a considerable distance between theoretical knowledge produced
and pedagogical practice.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Ensino, Avaliação, Produção textual, Prática pedagógica, Teaching, Evaluation, Text production, Pedagogical practice
Citação
MARTINS, Cláudio Rodrigues. Cenas de produção e avaliação de textos na alfabetização: um olhar sobre a prática pedagógica. 2018. 142 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Catalão, 2018.